
Comparative analysis of robotic vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer
Author(s) -
Li Chen,
Liping Liu,
Ning Wen,
Qiao Xiao,
Yuanguang Meng
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
world journal of clinical cases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.368
H-Index - 10
ISSN - 2307-8960
DOI - 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i20.3185
Subject(s) - medicine , cervical cancer , perioperative , radical hysterectomy , hysterectomy , laparoscopy , surgery , robotic surgery , cancer , complication , laparoscopic surgery , malignancy , general surgery
Cervical cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy, ranking first in female reproductive malignancies with more than 5 new cases and 275000 deaths each year. Traditionally, open radical hysterectomy is considered the standard surgical procedure for the treatment of resectable cervical cancer. The latest guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the European Society of Gynecological Oncology suggest that open surgery and laparoscopic surgery (using traditional laparoscopic or robotic techniques) are the main surgical approaches for radical hysterectomy for patients with stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer. Robotic surgery has been increasingly used in abdominal surgery and has shown more beneficial effects.