z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Evolution of endovascular mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke
Author(s) -
Colin J. Przybylowski,
Dale Ding,
Robert M. Starke,
Christopher R. Durst,
R. Webster Crowley,
Kenneth C. Liu
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
world journal of clinical cases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.368
H-Index - 10
ISSN - 2307-8960
DOI - 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i11.614
Subject(s) - medicine , thrombolysis , randomized controlled trial , revascularization , endovascular treatment , catheter , stroke (engine) , surgery , intensive care medicine , myocardial infarction , aneurysm , mechanical engineering , engineering
Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a common medical problem associated with significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. A small proportion of AIS patients meet eligibility criteria for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator, and its efficacy for large vessel occlusion is poor. Therefore, an increasing number of patients with AIS are being treated with endovascular mechanical thrombectomy when IVT is ineffective or contraindicated. Rapid advancement in catheter-based and endovascular device technology has led to significant improvements in rates of cerebral reperfusion with these devices. Stentrievers and modern aspiration catheters have now surpassed earlier generation devices in the degree and rapidity of revascularization. This progress has been achieved with no concurrent increase in risk of major complications or mortality, both when used alone or in combination with IVT. The initial randomized controlled trials comparing endovascular therapy to IVT for AIS failed to show superior outcomes with endovascular treatment, but key limitations of each trial may limit the significance of these results to current practice. While endovascular devices and operator experience continue to evolve, we are optimistic that this will be accompanied by improvements in patient outcomes. This review highlights the major endovascular devices used in current practice and the trials which have investigated their efficacy.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here