z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Importance of and Challenges with Adopting Life-Cycle Regulation and Reimbursement in Canada
Author(s) -
Melanie McPhail,
Christopher McCabe,
Dean A. Regier,
Tania Bubela
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
healthcare policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.391
H-Index - 22
eISSN - 1715-6580
pISSN - 1715-6572
DOI - 10.12927/hcpol.2022.26726
Subject(s) - reimbursement , covid-19 , business , political science , medicine , law , health care , pathology , disease , infectious disease (medical specialty)
Regulatory and reimbursement decisions for drugs and vaccines are increasingly based on limited safety and efficacy evidence. In this environment, life-cycle approaches to evaluation are needed. A life-cycle approach grants market approval and/or positive reimbursement decisions based on an undertaking to conduct post-market clinical trials that address evidentiary uncertainties, relying on the collection and analysis of post-market data. In practice, however, both conditional regulatory and reimbursement decisions have proven problematic. Here we discuss some of the regulatory implications and unsettled ethical and pragmatic issues, taking lessons from the recent experiences of Israel in rapidly approving the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here