z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
What Factors Impact Implementation of Critical Incident Disclosure in Ontario Hospitals: A Multiple-Case Study
Author(s) -
Michael Heenan,
Gillian Mulvale
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
healthcare policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.391
H-Index - 22
eISSN - 1715-6580
pISSN - 1715-6572
DOI - 10.12927/hcpol.2021.26431
Subject(s) - documentation , legislation , qualitative research , business , accounting , medicine , nursing , political science , computer science , social science , sociology , law , programming language
Guidelines and legislation prescribe how hospitals should conduct critical incident disclosures with patients. However, variation in secondary disclosure implementation can occur. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, this qualitative multiple-case study explored the factors that impact Ontario hospitals' secondary disclosure of critical incidents. The study concludes that while hospitals generally implement guidelines consistently, complex environments and differing professional backgrounds lead to variations. Consequently, hospitals should address timing delays, improve documentation and enhance support to clinicians who conduct the disclosures. Policy makers should consider the benefits and challenges of written disclosure, and offering patients a choice in the setting where disclosure occurs, as potential improvements.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here