z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Consequences of Private Involvement in Healthcare: The Australian Experience
Author(s) -
Stephen Duckett
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
healthcare policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.391
H-Index - 22
eISSN - 1715-6580
pISSN - 1715-6572
DOI - 10.12927/hcpol.2020.26228
Subject(s) - universalism , health care , individualism , inequality , proposition , public relations , political science , business , law , politics , mathematical analysis , philosophy , mathematics , epistemology
The Cambie proposition is the American individualistic one: If I can afford to pay for quick access to care, then that should be my right. It denies any concept of universalism, of the common good or that your rights might adversely impact my rights and my healthcare experience. Some private care proponents offer the magical prospect that this quicker access for the wealthy few has no impact on access for the many. It is even sometimes perversely argued that if the wealthy pay for access outside the public health system, that reduces demand for public care, freeing up space for others and, hey presto, magically everyone benefits from the increase in inequality. The Australian experience is that this magic does not work.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here