z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
„Psy i okaleczeńcy”
Author(s) -
Anna Rambiert-Kwaśniewska
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
między oryginałem a przekładem
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2391-6745
pISSN - 1689-9121
DOI - 10.12797/moap.26.2020.48.04
Subject(s) - neologism , multitude , scope (computer science) , philosophy , consistency (knowledge bases) , literature , linguistics , epistemology , computer science , artificial intelligence , art , programming language
„Psy i okaleczeńcy”. Translating Paul’s Invectives against Judaizers (Gal. 3:3; Phil. 3:2) Insults (contumelia) and invectives (invectiva oratio) were known to inspired authors, but their overtones in modern translations usually lose their strength. Should a translator avoid harsh words contained in the original invectives, or should he remain faithful to them? It is shown by analyzing Paul’s invectives in Phil. 3:2 and in Gal. 3:1.3. The author claims that: 1) avoiding the invectives in the translation weakens a message of the original text (Gal. 3:1.3); 2) the translational consistency (“źli pracownicy”; Phil. 3:2) favors understanding of the invectives; 3) the invectives that exist in Polish, when their scope deviates from the Greek original, require clarification in footnotes (“psy”; Phil. 3:2); 4) the multitude of hapax legomena in the Bible justifies the use of neologisms, as long as they accurately reflect the content of the original (“przerzezanie”; Phil. 3:2).

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom