Open AccessUnloading the Judicial System in Kazakhstan? Alternative Ways of Resolving Individual Labour Disputes
Author(s) -
Zhanna A. Khamzina,
Yermek A. Buribayev,
Kuralay Turlykhankyzy,
Zhanar Moldakhmetova,
Bakhytkali M. Koshpenbetov,
Nessibeli Kalkayeva
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
comparative law review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.102
H-Index - 1
eISSN - 2391-7644
pISSN - 0866-9449
DOI - 10.12775/clr.2021.011
Subject(s) - political science , universality (dynamical systems) , desk , enforcement , law , labour law , modernization theory , economic justice , social rights , work (physics) , law and economics , human rights , sociology , mechanical engineering , physics , quantum mechanics , engineering
The purpose of the study is to develop proposals for the modernization of the judicial form of protection of social and labour rights and interests of the individual. We are testing the hypothesis about the priority and universality of the judicial form of protection of rights in relation to other ways of applying for the restoration of violated labour interests; we assess access to justice as a criterion for the effectiveness of the judicial form of protection. The main method is a desk study of law enforcement practice, reports related to the functioning in Kazakhstan of a judicial form of protection of the social and labour rights of an individual, also the method of analysis of documents and statistical data of courts, a survey of examples of the best foreign practice in the work of specialized courts, and an analysis of international universal standards of access to justice in social and labour disputes.