z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
EVOLUTIVE INTERPRETATION OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS: POSSIBILITIES AND LIMITS. THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS AS A SUBJECT OF INTERPRETATION OF LAW
Author(s) -
А.И. Ковлер,
Anatoliy Kovler
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
žurnal zarubežnogo zakonodatelʹstva i sravnitelʹnogo pravovedeniâ
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2587-9995
pISSN - 1991-3222
DOI - 10.12737/20582
Subject(s) - margin of appreciation , subsidiarity , law , human rights , political science , convention , interpretation (philosophy) , fundamental rights , international human rights law , competence (human resources) , law and economics , sociology , european union , economics , philosophy , psychology , international trade , social psychology , linguistics
The article analyses a so called “evolutive interpretation” of the European Convention on Human Rights by the European Court of Human Rights creating its case-law. Doing so the Court as a subject of this interpretation has a legitimate competence in the light of the Article 32 of the Convention. The problem is how wide could be this interpretation taking in account the principle of subsidiarity of the european system of the protection of human rights and doctrine of the “margin of appreciation” of the contracting States.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here