z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Revisiting the Rist diagram for predicting operating conditions in blast furnaces with multiple injections
Author(s) -
Manuel Bailera,
Takao Nakagaki,
Ryoma Kataoka
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
open research europe
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2732-5121
DOI - 10.12688/openreseurope.14275.1
Subject(s) - blast furnace , coal , materials science , metallurgy , waste management , engineering
Background: The Rist diagram is useful for predicting changes in blast furnaces when the operating conditions are modified. In this paper, we revisit this methodology to provide a general model with additions and corrections. The reason for this is to study a new concept proposal that combines oxygen blast furnaces with Power to Gas technology. The latter produces synthetic methane by using renewable electricity and CO 2 to partly replace the fossil input in the blast furnace. Carbon is thus continuously recycled in a closed loop and geological storage is avoided. Methods: The new model is validated with three data sets corresponding to (1) an air-blown blast furnace without auxiliary injections, (2) an air-blown blast furnace with pulverized coal injection and (3) an oxygen blast furnace with top gas recycling and pulverized coal injection. The error is below 8% in all cases. Results: Assuming a 280 t HM /h oxygen blast furnace that produces 1154 kg CO2 /t HM , we can reduce the CO 2 emissions between 6.1% and 7.4% by coupling a 150 MW Power to Gas plant. This produces 21.8 kg/t HM of synthetic methane that replaces 22.8 kg/t HM of coke or 30.2 kg/t HM of coal. The gross energy penalization of the CO 2 avoidance is 27.1 MJ/kg CO2 when coke is replaced and 22.4 MJ/kg CO2 when coal is replaced. Considering the energy content of the saved fossil fuel, and the electricity no longer consumed in the air separation unit thanks to the O 2 coming from the electrolyzer, the net energy penalizations are 23.1 MJ/kg CO2 and 17.9 MJ/kg CO2 , respectively. Discussion: The proposed integration has energy penalizations greater than conventional amine carbon capture (typically 3.7 – 4.8 MJ/kg CO2 ), but in return it could reduce the economic costs thanks to diminishing the coke/coal consumption, reducing the electricity consumption in the air separation unit, and eliminating the requirement of geological storage.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here