Open AccessIonophoresis and LASER applications in facial nerve palsy
Author(s) -
Cristina Daia,
Ștefana Croitoru,
Ioana Cazacu,
Ruxandra Scuturoiu,
Octaviana Daia,
Mariana Axente,
Alina Gherghiceanu,
Eduard Stefan Pop,
Gelu Onose
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
balneo research journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2069-7619
pISSN - 2069-7597
DOI - 10.12680/balneo.2019.299
Subject(s) - medicine , palsy , facial nerve , etiology , temporomandibular joint , facial paralysis , physical therapy , surgery , dentistry , alternative medicine , pathology
Background and aim of the study. The aim of this article is to present the functional gain of the specific rehabilitation program in patients with facial nerve paralysis, irrespective of etiology, following a complex physiotherapeutic treatment, consisting of the combined application of ionophoresis and LASER.Material and Method. We performed a retrospective analysis of 26 patients having their consent and The Theaching Emergency Hospital “Bagdasar-Arseni” (TEHBA) ethics Committee’s approval, N.O. 683/21.02.2019. The patients were admitted to the Neuro-Muscular Rehabilitation Clinic Division of TEHBA between April 2011 and March 2019. The patients were over the age of 18, diagnosed with facial nerve palsy and received physiotherapy consisting of the combined application of: ionophoresis with 1% potassium iodide, applied to positive electrode, preauricular, and the negative electrode, retroauricular, for 20 minutes and LASER, to the temporomandibular joint on the affected part, 4 points : radiant exposure per dose 3 J/cm2, frequency 5 Hz, probe area 1 cm2, power 62 mW, for 10 sessions and two sets of the same formula at the temporomandibular joint on the opposite side.Results. From the etiological point of view, the study included an equal number of patients with peripheric facial palsy (PFP) and with central facial palsy (CFP), respectively 13 in each group. Overall, at least 1 patient in 2 had a positive response to physiotherapy. In the patients with PFP, 77% of patients responded to the treatment and 46% had complete remission. In the patients with CFP, only 30% responded to treatment and only one had complete remission. Approximately half of the patients did not have any adverse reactions (46%), while the rest showed temporary erythema (46%), or local tingling sensation over a variable period of time (8%).Conclusion. Applying the combination of ionophoresis and LASER as physiotherapic treatment is particularly effective in peripheric facial nerve paresis. The method is safe and well tolerated, therefore we propose its use in this type of pathology.Key words: Laser therapy, facial nerve paralysis, ionophoresis,