Research and the Approval Process: The Organization of Persuasion
Author(s) -
Emeric Henry,
Marco Ottaviani
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
american economic review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 16.936
H-Index - 297
eISSN - 1944-7981
pISSN - 0002-8282
DOI - 10.1257/aer.20171919
Subject(s) - persuasion , normative , statistician , economics , process (computing) , benchmark (surveying) , power (physics) , bargaining power , microeconomics , law and economics , political science , law , computer science , social psychology , psychology , statistics , physics , mathematics , geodesy , quantum mechanics , geography , operating system
An informer sequentially collects information at a cost to influence an evaluator's choice between rejection and approval. Payoffs and control rights are split between informer and evaluator depending on the organizational rules governing the approval process. We compare the performance of different organizations from a positive and normative perspective, depending on the commitment power of informer and evaluator. As a welfare benchmark we recover Wald's (1947) classic solution for a statistician with payoff equal to the sum of our informer and evaluator. We apply the analysis to the regulatory process for drug approval and to the market for new technologies.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom