Bad Investments and Missed Opportunities? Postwar Capital Flows to Asia and Latin America
Author(s) -
Lee E. Ohanian,
Paulina Restrepo-Echavarría,
Mark L. J. Wright
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
american economic review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 16.936
H-Index - 297
eISSN - 1944-7981
pISSN - 0002-8282
DOI - 10.1257/aer.20151510
Subject(s) - economics , latin americans , capital flows , capital (architecture) , monetary economics , incentive , investment (military) , capital market , capital outflow , capital formation , macroeconomics , international economics , financial capital , market economy , human capital , finance , liberalization , philosophy , linguistics , archaeology , politics , political science , law , history
Since 1950, the economies of East Asia grew rapidly but received little inter-national capital, while Latin America received considerable international capitaleven as their economies stagnated. The literature typically explains the failureof capital to flow to high growth regions as resulting from international capitalmarket imperfections. This paper proposes a broader thesis that country-specificdistortions, such as domestic labor and capital market distortions, also impactcapital flows. We develop a DSGE model of Asia, Latin America, and the Rest ofthe World that features an open-economy business cycle accounting framework tomeasure these domestic and international distortions, and to quantify their con-tributions to international capital flows. We find that domestic distortions havebeen the predominant drivers of international capital flows, and that the generalequilibrium effects of these distortions are very large. International capital market distortions also matter, but less.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom