Do Expiring Budgets Lead to Wasteful Year-End Spending? Evidence from Federal Procurement
Author(s) -
Jeffrey B. Liebman,
Neale Mahoney
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
american economic review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 16.936
H-Index - 297
eISSN - 1944-7981
pISSN - 0002-8282
DOI - 10.1257/aer.20131296
Subject(s) - fiscal year , procurement , incentive , government (linguistics) , government spending , quality (philosophy) , business , rest (music) , lead (geology) , government procurement , economics , finance , marketing , welfare , microeconomics , market economy , medicine , linguistics , philosophy , cardiology , epistemology , geomorphology , geology
Many organizations have budgets that expire at the end of the fiscal year and may face incentives to rush to spend resources on low-quality projects at year's end. We test these predictions using data on procurement spending by the US federal government. Spending in the last week of the year is 4.9 times higher than the rest-of-the-year weekly average, and year-end information technology projects have substantially lower quality ratings. We also analyze the gains from allowing agencies to roll over unused funds into the next fiscal year. (JEL H57, H61)
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom