z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Defensive Investments and the Demand for Air Quality: Evidence from the NOx Budget Program
Author(s) -
Olivier Deschênes,
Michael Greenstone,
Joseph Shapiro
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
american economic review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 16.936
H-Index - 297
eISSN - 1944-7981
pISSN - 0002-8282
DOI - 10.1257/aer.20131002
Subject(s) - economics , investment (military) , air quality index , nitrogen oxides , natural resource economics , emissions trading , nox , empirical evidence , quality (philosophy) , agricultural economics , climate change , waste management , chemistry , engineering , ecology , philosophy , physics , epistemology , politics , meteorology , political science , law , biology , organic chemistry , combustion
The demand for air quality depends on health impacts and defensive investments, but little research assesses the empirical importance of defenses. A rich quasi-experiment suggests that the Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) Budget Program (NBP), a cap-and-trade market, decreased NOx emissions, ambient ozone concentrations, pharmaceutical expenditures, and mortality rates. The annual reductions in pharmaceutical purchases, a key defensive investment, and mortality are valued at about $800 million and $1.1 billion, respectively, suggesting that defenses are over one-third of willingness-to-pay for reductions in NOx emissions. Further, estimates indicate that the NBP’s benefits easily exceed its costs and that NOx reductions have substantial benefits.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom