z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Firm Size Distortions and the Productivity Distribution: Evidence from France
Author(s) -
Luis Garicano,
Claire Lelarge,
John Van Reenen
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
american economic review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 16.936
H-Index - 297
eISSN - 1944-7981
pISSN - 0002-8282
DOI - 10.1257/aer.20130232
Subject(s) - counterfactual thinking , welfare , productivity , economics , labour economics , distribution (mathematics) , wage , population , variable (mathematics) , econometrics , demographic economics , macroeconomics , mathematical analysis , philosophy , demography , mathematics , sociology , market economy , epistemology
We show how size-contingent laws can be used to identify the equilibrium and welfare effects of labor regulation.\udOur framework incorporates such regulations into the Lucas (1978) model and applies it to France where many labor laws start to bind on firms with 50 or more employees. Using population data on firms between 1995 and 2007, we structurally estimate the key parameters of our model to construct counterfactual size, productivity and welfare distributions. We find that the cost of these regulations is equivalent to that of a 2.3% variable tax on labor. In our baseline case with French levels of partial real wage inflexibility welfare costs of the regulations are 3.4% of GDP (falling to 1.3% if real wages were perfectly flexible downwards). The main losers from the regulation are workers - and to a lesser extent, large firms - and the main winners are small firms

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom