How Does Risk Selection Respond to Risk Adjustment? New Evidence from the Medicare Advantage Program
Author(s) -
J. David Brown,
Mark Duggan,
Ilyana Kuziemko,
William A Woolston
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
american economic review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 16.936
H-Index - 297
eISSN - 1944-7981
pISSN - 0002-8282
DOI - 10.1257/aer.104.10.3335
Subject(s) - actuarial science , medicare advantage , adverse selection , capitation , selection (genetic algorithm) , economics , payment , variance (accounting) , selection bias , medicine , health care , finance , accounting , computer science , pathology , artificial intelligence , economic growth
To combat adverse selection, governments increasingly base payments to health plans and providers on enrollees’ scores from risk-adjustment formulae. In 2004, Medicare began to risk-adjust capitation payments to private Medicare Advantage (MA) plans to reduce selection-driven overpayments. But because the variance of medical costs increases with the predicted mean, incentivizing enrollment of individuals with higher scores can increase the scope for enrolling "overpriced" individuals with costs significantly below the formula's prediction. Indeed, after risk adjustment, MA plans enrolled individuals with higher scores but lower costs conditional on their score. We find no evidence that overpayments were on net reduced.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom