z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Betrayal Aversion: Evidence from Brazil, China, Oman, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States: Comment
Author(s) -
Gary E. Bolton,
Axel Ockenfels
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
american economic review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 16.936
H-Index - 297
eISSN - 1944-7981
pISSN - 0002-8282
DOI - 10.1257/aer.100.1.628
Subject(s) - betrayal , economics , risk aversion (psychology) , context (archaeology) , inequality , china , affect (linguistics) , stochastic game , actuarial science , financial economics , social psychology , microeconomics , psychology , expected utility hypothesis , political science , geography , mathematical analysis , mathematics , archaeology , communication , law
In a series of binary choice problems, we investigate how a chooser's risk taking changes when others share in their personal risk, either equally or unequally. We find that when the safe option yields inequality, the risky option is taken significantly more often. On the other hand, the inequality resulting from the risky choice does not affect risk taking. We also find that choosers tend to be less risk-averse in a one-person context compared to when the risk also affects the payoff of another. (C72, D81, Z13)

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom