Premium
Reply to a comment by R. J. Smalley and R. A. Antonia on ‘The local isotropy hypothesis and the turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate in the atmospheric surface layer’ (October B, 2004, 130 , 2733–2752)
Author(s) -
Chamecki M.,
Dias N. L.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
quarterly journal of the royal meteorological society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.744
H-Index - 143
eISSN - 1477-870X
pISSN - 0035-9009
DOI - 10.1256/qj.05.144a
Subject(s) - turbulence kinetic energy , turbulence , homogeneity (statistics) , isotropy , dissipation , physics , homogeneous , kinetic energy , homogeneous isotropic turbulence , meteorology , statistical physics , classical mechanics , mathematics , optics , direct numerical simulation , thermodynamics , statistics , reynolds number
In response to Smalley and Antonia's comment, we agree that our statement that closer‐to‐zero velocity–velocity‐increment correlation for larger turbulence intensity values cannot be taken as a measure of homogeneity. We also explain that, although not aware that the velocity–velocity‐increment correlation cannot be zero at finite r 1 , we concentrated most of our analysis on its tendency towards zero with decreasing r 1 , since this limit is well known for homogeneous turbulence. Copyright © 2006 Royal Meteorological Society
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom