Open AccessSignificant Improvement of Visual Functions after Removal of an Intracranial Giant Optic Nerve Glioma Revealing Exophytic Growth: Case Report
Author(s) -
Tong Zhiyong,
Mashahiko Wanibuchi,
T Uede,
Satoshi Tanabe,
Kazuo Hashi
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
neurosurgery/neurosurgery online
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.485
H-Index - 34
eISSN - 1081-1281
pISSN - 0148-396X
DOI - 10.1227/01.neu.0000204308.59999.60
Subject(s) - medicine , optic nerve , optic chiasma , neurofibromatosis , glioma , optic neuropathy , pilocytic astrocytoma , magnetic resonance imaging , pathology , radiology , anatomy , astrocytoma , cancer research
OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE: Intracranial giant optic nerve gliomas, usually presumed as optic chiasmatic gliomas, are much less common. The architectural tumor form of optic nerve glioma without neurofibromatosis type 1 is usually the expansile-intraneural pattern. The exophytic optic nerve gliomas without neurofibromatosis type 1 are relatively uncommon. Surgical decompression for intracranial optic gliomas frequently leads to clinical improvement, but obvious improvement of vision is rare. We report a case that demonstrated significant recovery of visual function after removal of the intracranial giant optic nerve glioma, revealing exophytic growth. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 13-year-old boy presented with visual impairment in both eyes. Magnetic resonance images (MRI) disclosed a 6 cm diameter mass in the suprasellar area. On heavily T2-reversed MRIs, it was obvious that the intracranial portion of right optic nerve was enlarged, and optic tracts were shifted to the left by the tumor. The relationship of the tumor to the chiasma could not be affirmed on MRIs. INTERVENTION: A right frontotemporal craniotomy for decompression of the optic apparatus was performed. After the majority of the tumor was resected, it became clear that the tumor originated in the right optic nerve. The tumor exophytically grew and dislocated the optic chiasma and optic tracts. Significant improvement of visual functions began from the first week after surgery and continued gradually thereafter. The histological diagnosis was pilocytic astrocytoma. A follow-up MRI taken 4 years after surgery showed no regrowth of the residual tumor. CONCLUSION: Giant exophytic gliomas without neurofibromatosis type 1 may arise from the intracranial portion of an isolated optic nerve. Direct visualization of optic component by heavily T2-reversed MRI could more precisely delineate the relationship of the intracranial optic nerve glioma to the optic apparatus. Surgery may be indicated in giant exophytic intracranial optic nerve gliomas and preoperative postulated optic chiasmatic gliomas. Microsurgical resection can induce postoperative visual improvement without regrowth of the residual tumor.