
The Influence of Prone Positioning on the Accuracy of Calibrated and Uncalibrated Pulse Contour–Derived Cardiac Index Measurements
Author(s) -
Jörn Grensemann,
Ulrike Bruecken,
András Treszl,
Frank Wappler,
Samir G. Sakka
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
anesthesia and analgesia/anesthesia and analgesia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.404
H-Index - 201
eISSN - 1526-7598
pISSN - 0003-2999
DOI - 10.1213/ane.0b013e31827fe77e
Subject(s) - medicine , supine position , cardiac output , cardiac index , prone position , population , limits of agreement , bland–altman plot , anesthesia , hemodynamics , cardiology , nuclear medicine , environmental health
Patients with lung failure who undergo prone positioning often receive extended hemodynamic monitoring. We investigated the influence of modified prone positioning (135°) on the accuracy of pulse contour-derived calibrated cardiac index (CIPC) and uncalibrated cardiac index (CIVIG) in this patient population with transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) as reference technique.