Open AccessA Comparative Study of Transdermal 10% Lidocaine Gel With and Without Glycyrrhetinic Acid Monohemiphthalate Disodium for Pain Reduction at Venous Cannulation
Author(s) -
Tatsuhiko Kano,
Akihito Hashiguchi,
Mari Nakamura,
Tohru Morioka,
Misako Mishima,
Masahiro Nakano
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
anesthesia and analgesia/anesthesia and analgesia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.404
H-Index - 201
eISSN - 1526-7598
pISSN - 0003-2999
DOI - 10.1213/00000539-199204000-00012
Subject(s) - medicine , venipuncture , lidocaine , transdermal , anesthesia , erythema , local anesthetic , adverse effect , topical anesthetic , surgery , pharmacology
The clinical benefits of transdermal 10% lidocaine base gels with and without 3% glycyrrhetinic acid monohemiphthalate disodium (GAMHPh) for reduction of pain at venous cannulation were compared in a randomized, double-blind fashion in 24 surgical patients. After about 60 min of occlusive transdermal application, the mean pinprick pain score (1.3 +/- 1.5) in the GAMHPh group (n = 12), graded by noting the number of painful pinpricks out of five, was significantly less than that (2.5 +/- 1.7) in the control group (n = 12) (P less than 0.05). Twelve patients (eight in the GAMHPh group and four in the control group) who had a pinprick score less than 1 underwent venous cannulation without intradermal injection of a local anesthetic. The pain score at venipuncture, graded by the patients on a scale of 5, was significantly less in the GAMHPh group than that in the control group (1.9 +/- 1.1 vs 3.3 +/- 1.0, P less than 0.05). Erythema observed in 8 of the 24 patients was the only adverse local reaction. Addition of 3% GAMHPh to the lidocaine gel is useful in promoting transdermal lidocaine absorption.