z-logo
Premium
Classification objects, ideal observers & generative models
Author(s) -
Olman Cheryl,
Kersten Daniel
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
cognitive science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.498
H-Index - 114
eISSN - 1551-6709
pISSN - 0364-0213
DOI - 10.1207/s15516709cog2802_5
Subject(s) - observer (physics) , artificial intelligence , generative model , computer science , computer vision , curse of dimensionality , object (grammar) , representation (politics) , pattern recognition (psychology) , cognitive neuroscience of visual object recognition , generative grammar , physics , quantum mechanics , politics , political science , law
A successful vision system must solve the problem of deriving geometrical information about three‐dimensional objects from two‐dimensional photometric input. The human visual system solves this problem with remarkable efficiency, and one challenge in vision research is to understand howneural representations of objects are formed and what visual information is used to form these representations. Ideal observer analysis has demonstrated the advantages of studying vision from the perspective of explicit generative models and a specified visual task, which divides the causes of image variations into the separate categories of signal and noise. Classification image techniques estimate the visual information used in a task from the properties of “noise” images that interact most strongly with the task. Both ideal observer analysis and classification image techniques rely on the assumption of a generative model. We show here how the ability of the classification image approach to understand how an observer uses visual information can be improved by matching the type and dimensionality of the model to that of the neural representation or internal template being studied. Because image variation in real world object tasks can arise from both geometrical shape and photometric (illumination or material) changes, a realistic image generation process should model geometry as well as intensity. A simple example is used to demonstrate what we refer to as a “classification object” approach to studying three‐dimensional object representations.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here