Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Goal Contents in Self-Determination Theory: Another Look at the Quality of Academic Motivation
Author(s) -
Maarten Vansteenkiste,
Willy Lens,
Edward L. Deci
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
educational psychologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.856
H-Index - 126
eISSN - 1532-6985
pISSN - 0046-1520
DOI - 10.1207/s15326985ep4101_4
Subject(s) - psychology , self determination theory , intrinsic motivation , framing (construction) , competence (human resources) , autonomy , social psychology , goal theory , cognitive evaluation theory , cognitive psychology , political science , law , structural engineering , engineering
Examination of motivational dynamics in academic contexts within self-determination theory has centered primarily around both the motives (initially intrinsic vs. extrinsic, later autono- mous vs. controlled) that regulate learners' study behavior and the contexts that promote or hin- der these regulations. Less attention has been paid to the goal contents (intrinsic vs. extrinsic) that learners hold and to the different goal contents that are communicated in schools to in- crease the perceived relevance of the learning. Recent field experiments are reviewed showing that intrinsic goal framing (relative to extrinsic goal framing and no-goal framing) produces deeper engagement in learning activities, better conceptual learning, and higher persistence at learning activities. These effects occur for both intrinsically and extrinsically oriented individu- als. Results are discussed in terms of self-determination theory's concept of basic psychologi- cal needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom