z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Patients' Expectations of Benefits From Large-Panel Genomic Tumor Testing in Rural Community Oncology Practices
Author(s) -
Eric C. Anderson,
John DiPalazzo,
Emily Edelman,
Petra Helbig,
Kate Reed,
Susan Miesfeldt,
Christian A. Thomas,
F. Lee Lucas,
Anny Fenton,
Andrey Antov,
Michael J. Hall,
J. Scott Roberts,
Jens Rueter,
Paul K. J. Han
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
jco precision oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2473-4284
DOI - 10.1200/po.21.00235
Subject(s) - medicine , cancer , test (biology) , stage (stratigraphy) , oncology , breast cancer , family medicine , paleontology , biology
PURPOSE Large-panel genomic tumor testing (GTT) is an emerging technology that promises to make cancer treatment more precise. Because GTT is novel and complex, patients may have unrealistic expectations and limited knowledge of its benefits. These problems may limit the clinical value of GTT, but their prevalence and associated factors have not been explored.METHODS Patients with cancer enrolled in a large initiative to disseminate GTT in community oncology practices completed surveys assessing their expectations, knowledge, and attitudes about GTT. The study sample (N = 1,139) consisted of patients with a range of cancer types (22% gynecologic, 14% lung, 10% colon, 10% breast, and 46% other malignancies) and cancer stages (4% stage I, 3% stage II, 15% stage III, and 74% stage IV). Mean age was 64 years (standard deviation = 11); 668 (59%) were women; 71% had no college degree; 57% came from households with less than $50,000 US dollars household income; and 73% lived in a rural area.RESULTS Generally, patients had high expectations that they would benefit from GTT (M = 2.81 on 0-4 scale) and positive attitudes toward it (M = 2.98 on 0-4 scale). Patients also had relatively poor knowledge about GTT (48% correct answers on an objective test of GTT knowledge). Greater expectations for GTT were associated with lower knowledge (b = –0.46; P < .001), more positive attitudes (b = 0.40; P < .001), and lower education (b = –0.53; P < .001).CONCLUSION This research suggests patients have high expectations that they will benefit from GTT, which is associated with low knowledge, positive attitudes, and low education. More research is needed to understand the concordance between expectations and actual clinical outcomes.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom