Open AccessEye-Tracking Study to Enhance Usability of Molecular Diagnostics Reports in Cancer Precision Medicine
Author(s) -
Vishakha Sharma,
Allan Fong,
Robert A. Beckman,
Shruti Rao,
Simina M. Boca,
Peter B. McGarvey,
Raj M. Ratwani,
Subha Madhavan
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
jco precision oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.405
H-Index - 22
ISSN - 2473-4284
DOI - 10.1200/po.17.00296
Subject(s) - usability , medicine , clinical trial , test (biology) , medical physics , medline , workflow , precision medicine , medical education , pathology , computer science , paleontology , human–computer interaction , database , political science , law , biology
Purpose We conducted usability studies on commercially available molecular diagnostic (MDX) test reports to identify strengths and weaknesses in content and form that drive clinical decision making. Given routine genomic testing in cancer medicine, oncologists must interpret MDX reports as well as evidence concerning clinical utility of biomarkers accurately for treatment or trial selection. This work aims to evaluate effectiveness of MDX reports in facilitating cancer treatment planning.Methods Fourteen clinicians at an academic tertiary care medical facility, with a wide range of experience in oncology and in the use of molecular testing, participated in this study. Three commercially available, widely used, Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)–certified, College of American Pathologists (CAP)–accredited test reports (labeled Laboratories A, B, and C) were used. Eye tracking, surveys, and think-aloud protocols were used to collect usability data for these MDX reports focusing on ease of comprehension and actionabilityResults Clinicians found two primary areas in molecular diagnostic reports most useful for patient care: therapy options with benefit or lack of benefit to patients, including enrolling clinical trials; and pathogenic tumor molecular anomalies detected. Therapeutic implications and therapy classes such as US Food and Drug Administration–approved off-label, on-label, clinical trials were critical for decision making. However, all reports had usability and comprehension issues in these areas and could be improved.Conclusion Focused usability studies can help drive our understanding of the clinical workflow for use of molecular diagnostic tests in cancer care. This in turn can have major effects on quality of care, outcomes, costs, and patient satisfaction. This study demonstrates the use of specific usability techniques (eye tracking and think-aloud protocols) to help clinical laboratories improve MDX report design in a precision oncology treatment setting.