z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
ReCAP: Physician Experience and Attitudes Toward Addressing the Cost of Cancer Care
Author(s) -
Ivy Altomare,
Blair Billings Irwin,
S. Yousuf Zafar,
Kevin Houck,
Bailey Maloney,
Rachel A. Greenup,
Jeffrey Peppercorn
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of oncology practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.555
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1935-469X
pISSN - 1554-7477
DOI - 10.1200/jop.2015.007401
Subject(s) - medicine , respondent , family medicine , odds , odds ratio , health care , medline , logistic regression , political science , law , economics , economic growth
QUESTION ASKED: Because the cost of oncologic care is perpetually rising, we wanted to know how often physicians who treat cancer discuss the cost of care (both out-of-pocket and societal) with their patients, what the nature of those discussions is, and whether such discussions affect treatment decisions.SUMMARY ANSWER: Sixty percent of responding physicians reported addressing costs frequently or always in clinic, 40% addressed costs rarely or never, and 36% did not believe it is the doctor’s responsibility to explain costs of care to patients. Additional responses are listed in Table 3 . The majority of physicians feel their patients are not well informed about costs. “I don’t know enough/lack of resources” is the largest reported barrier to cost discussions, and those who reported frequent discussions were significantly more likely to explain costs and to prioritize treatments in terms of cost. [Table: see text]METHODS: A 15-question, study-specific, self-administered anonymous survey was sent electronically to a randomly selected sample of 2,290 ASCO physician members.BIAS, CONFOUNDING FACTOR(S), DRAWBACKS: Our overall response rate was somewhat low at 15%, with an adjusted response rate of 25% after adjusting for nonpracticing physician ASCO members. This increased the potential for selection bias, by which the respondents to this survey may not represent the true beliefs and practices of medical, radiation, and surgical oncologists.REAL-LIFE IMPLICATIONS: Our study offers a current snapshot of the frequency, nature, and attitudes toward cost discussions among medical, radiation, and surgical oncologists and their patients. Although the majority of responding physicians seem to agree that such discussions are legitimate—and arguably necessary—components of quality cancer care, there remains a substantial proportion who do not discuss costs nor feel it is their duty. Few believe they have adequate resources to discuss costs, suggesting that greater cost transparency, education concerning costs of care, tools to facilitate discussions, and validated interventions are needed.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom