Open AccessStereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or surgery in early stage (I & II) non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Author(s) -
Hirsh Koyi,
Kameran Daham,
Mamdoh AlAmeri,
Eva Brandén
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of global oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.002
H-Index - 17
ISSN - 2378-9506
DOI - 10.1200/jgo.2019.5.suppl.99
Subject(s) - medicine , stage (stratigraphy) , lung cancer , cardiothoracic surgery , surgery , paleontology , biology
99 Background: For patients with NSCLC clinical stages I and II disease with no medical contraindications, surgery is treatment of choice showing 5-year survival rates of about 60–80% for stage I and 40–50% for stage II, respectively. However, for patients who are medically or technically unfit for surgery and for patients refusing surgery, SBRT is an alternative with local control rates > 90% at 3 years. Methods: Medical journals in all patients with stage I or II NSCLC who were underwent surgery and treated with SBRT at the Department of oncology or thoracic surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden from 2003 to 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Results: In all, 267 (74.8%) underwent surgery and 90 (25.2%) were treated with SBRT. Mean, median and range of age among the surgery group was 69.2, 70.0 and 41-85 years, while in the SBRT group, these figures were 77.6, 79.0 and 52-90 years. The difference in age between the groups was significant (p < 0.001).There were significantly more comorbidites in the SBRT group. Among the surgery group, 90.2% were smokers or former smokers. The figures for SBRT group was 91.1%. The difference in smoking habits between the groups was not significant (p < 0.713). There was a significant difference in performance status (PS) between the groups (p < 0.001) with with PS 0-1 in 99.3% in the surgery group compared with 66.7% in the SBRT group. There was a significant difference in lung function with median FEV1 2.11 liter in surgery group compared to 1.3 in the SBRT group. The figures for median FEV1% was 85.0% respectively 57.0%. The median overall survival was 7.7 years for the surgery group and 3.72 years for the SBRT group (p < 0.001). Five years survival was 65.5% in the surgery group and 31.6% in the SBRT group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The much worse median overall survival in the SBRT group can be explained by the selection of patients, but still, a median survival for nearly 4 years in an elderly group with so many comorbidities and a poor PS indicates that SBRT has been of value.