z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Assessing the Quality of Life of Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Treatment at the National Radiotherapy Center, Accra, Ghana
Author(s) -
Samuel Yaw Opoku
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of global oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.002
H-Index - 17
ISSN - 2378-9506
DOI - 10.1200/jgo.18.57200
Subject(s) - medicine , quality of life (healthcare) , radiation therapy , breast cancer , cancer , modalities , physical therapy , surgery , nursing , sociology , social science
Background: Quality of life is an important clinical outcome in assessing health care. It is a concept that includes many subjective elements: physical, emotional and social function, attitudes to illness, patient's daily lives-including family interactions. Quality of life is increasingly used as an outcome measure in oncology research studies appearing in a variety of forms in several literatures. Aim: The study was aimed at assessing the quality of life of breast cancer patient undergoing treatment at the Radiotherapy Center, Accra, Ghana. Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive study involved 30 patients over a 3-month period. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-B) Specific Scale for Breast Cancer Survey Instrument was used to collect the data which was analyzed with SPSS. Results: The peak age range of the patients was between (56-65) years. Out of these, 60% (n=18/30) received triple treatment modalities, namely, surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Surgery and chemotherapy alone accounted for 16.7% (n=5/30). Further 10% (3/30) had surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy. Three patients 10% had only surgery and one patient (3.3%) received both chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The scores for the quality of life domains were general emotional well-being (18.8+8.4), general physical well-being (16.5+6.1), general social well-being (14.3+7.0) and general functional well-being (10.9+5.7). The quality of life of three patients (10%) was found to be poor, while 70% (n=21/30) had stable quality of life and 20% (n=6/30) with good quality of life. Conclusion: Considering the quality of life domains or subscale scores and the overall quality of life scores, it is concluded that no significant difference exists ( P > 0.05) in the quality of life status of the patients irrespective the treatment modality received.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here