Prognostic Value of Stromal Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Young, Node-Negative, Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients Who Did Not Receive (neo)Adjuvant Systemic Therapy
Author(s) -
Vincent M. T. de Jong,
Yuwei Wang,
Natalie D. ter Hoeve,
Mark Opdam,
Nikolas Stathonikos,
Katarzyna Jóźwiak,
Michael Hauptmann,
Sten Cornelissen,
Willem Vreuls,
Efraim H. Rosenberg,
Esther A. Koop,
Zsuzsanna Varga,
Carolien H. M. van Deurzen,
Antien L. Mooyaart,
Alicia Córdoba,
Emma J. Groen,
Joost Bart,
Stefan M. Willems,
Vasiliki Zolota,
Jelle Wesseling,
Anna Sapino,
Ewa Chmielik,
Aleš Ryška,
Annegien Broeks,
Adri C. Voogd,
Sherene Loi,
Stefan Michiels,
Gabe S. Sonke,
Elsken van der Wall,
Sabine Siesling,
P. J. van Diest,
Marjanka K. Schmidt,
Marleen Kok,
Gwen Dackus,
Roberto Salgado,
Sabine C. Linn
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
journal of clinical oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 10.482
H-Index - 548
eISSN - 1527-7755
pISSN - 0732-183X
DOI - 10.1200/jco.21.01536
Subject(s) - medicine , breast cancer , cumulative incidence , hazard ratio , oncology , triple negative breast cancer , proportional hazards model , incidence (geometry) , population , adjuvant therapy , cancer , cohort , confidence interval , physics , environmental health , optics
PURPOSE Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is considered aggressive, and therefore, virtually all young patients with TNBC receive (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. Increased stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) have been associated with a favorable prognosis in TNBC. However, whether this association holds for patients who are node-negative (N0), young (< 40 years), and chemotherapy-naïve, and thus can be used for chemotherapy de-escalation strategies, is unknown.METHODS We selected all patients with N0 TNBC diagnosed between 1989 and 2000 from a Dutch population–based registry. Patients were age < 40 years at diagnosis and had not received (neo)adjuvant systemic therapy, as was standard practice at the time. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks were retrieved (PALGA: Dutch Pathology Registry), and a pathology review including sTILs was performed. Patients were categorized according to sTILs (< 30%, 30%-75%, and ≥ 75%). Multivariable Cox regression was performed for overall survival, with or without sTILs as a covariate. Cumulative incidence of distant metastasis or death was analyzed in a competing risk model, with second primary tumors as competing risk.RESULTS sTILs were scored for 441 patients. High sTILs (≥ 75%; 21%) translated into an excellent prognosis with a 15-year cumulative incidence of a distant metastasis or death of only 2.1% (95% CI, 0 to 5.0), whereas low sTILs (< 30%; 52%) had an unfavorable prognosis with a 15-year cumulative incidence of a distant metastasis or death of 38.4% (32.1 to 44.6). In addition, every 10% increment of sTILs decreased the risk of death by 19% (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.81; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.87), which are an independent predictor adding prognostic information to standard clinicopathologic variables (χ 2 = 46.7, P < .001).CONCLUSION Chemotherapy-naïve, young patients with N0 TNBC with high sTILs (≥ 75%) have an excellent long-term prognosis. Therefore, sTILs should be considered for prospective clinical trials investigating (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy de-escalation strategies.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom