Phase III Multicenter Trial of Doxorubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide Followed by Paclitaxel Compared With Doxorubicin Plus Paclitaxel Followed by Weekly Paclitaxel As Adjuvant Therapy for Women With High-Risk Breast Cancer
Author(s) -
David Loesch,
F. Anthony Greco,
Neil Senzer,
Howard A. Burris,
John D. Hainsworth,
Stephen E. Jones,
Svetislava J. Vukelja,
John F. Sandbach,
Frankie A. Holmes,
Scot Sedlacek,
John Pippen,
Deborah Lindquist,
Kristi McIntyre,
Joanne L. Blum,
Manuel Modiano,
Kristi A. Boehm,
Feng Zhan,
Lina Asmar,
Nicholas J. Robert
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of clinical oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 10.482
H-Index - 548
eISSN - 1527-7755
pISSN - 0732-183X
DOI - 10.1200/jco.2009.24.1000
Subject(s) - medicine , breast cancer , paclitaxel , cyclophosphamide , doxorubicin , adjuvant therapy , chemotherapy , gastroenterology , cancer , surgery , urology , oncology
Purpose This study compared disease-free survival (DFS) obtained with two different regimens of adjuvant therapy in high-risk breast cancer.Methods Women (who had performance status [PS] of 0 to 1) with operable, histologically confirmed, stage I to III adenocarcinoma of the breast were eligible. Patients had undergone primary surgery with no residual tumor. Treatments were as follows: arm 1 was doxorubicin 60 mg/m 2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m 2 every 3 weeks for four cycles followed by paclitaxel 175 mg/m 2 every 3 weeks for four cycles (ie, AC-P); and arm 2 was doxorubicin 50 mg/m 2 plus paclitaxel 200 mg/m 2 every 3 weeks for four cycles followed by paclitaxel 80 mg/m 2 weekly for 12 weeks.Results Overall, 1,830 patients were enrolled and 1,801 were treated: arm 1 (n = 906; AC→P) and arm 2 (n = 895; AP-WP). Overall, patients had a PS of 0 (88%), had estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor–positive disease (52%), had one to three positive nodes (46%), and were postmenopausal (57%); the median age was 52 years. Currently, 1,640 patients (90%) are alive. The 6-year DFS was 79% to 80% in both groups. Disease relapse was the cause of death for 83 patients in arm 1 and in 66 patients of arm 2. Overall 6-year survival rates were 82% and 87% in arms 1 and 2, respectively. Reasons for patients being taken off study treatment included toxicity (13% in arm 1 v 20% in arm 2), progressive disease or recurrence (7% v 5%), and consent withdrawn (9% v 8%), respectively. The most frequent toxicities were hematologic, including neutropenia and leukopenia followed by neuropathy, myalgia, nausea, fatigue, headache, arthralgia, and vomiting.Conclusion The results indicate that the AP-WP regimen is an equally effective and tolerable option for the adjuvant treatment of patients with high-risk breast cancer. The substitution of paclitaxel for cyclophosphamide results in comparable effectiveness of the regimen.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom