Open AccessThe Program for Enhanced Training in Cancer: An Initial Experience of Supporting Capacity Building for Oncology Training in Sub-Saharan Africa
Author(s) -
Madeleine G. Fish,
Jeannette Parkes,
Nazima Dharsee,
Scott DrydenPeterson,
Jason A. Efstathiou,
Lowell E. Schnipper,
Bruce A. Chabner,
Aparna R. Parikh
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
jco global oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2687-8941
DOI - 10.1200/go.20.70000
Subject(s) - economic shortage , training (meteorology) , tanzania , medicine , health care , medical education , family medicine , workforce , survivorship curve , nursing , political science , population , geography , socioeconomics , sociology , government (linguistics) , environmental health , linguistics , philosophy , meteorology , law
PURPOSE Sub-Saharan Africa is simultaneously facing a rising incidence of cancer and a dearth of medical professionals as a result of insufficient training numbers and emigration, creating a growing shortage of cancer care. To combat this, Massachusetts General Hospital and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center partnered with institutions in South Africa, Tanzania, and Rwanda to develop a fellowship exchange program to supplement the training of African oncologists practicing in their home countries.METHODS In its initial 2 years (2018 and 2019), the Program for Enhanced Training in Cancer (POETIC) hosted a pilot cohort of 14 fellows for 3-week observerships in their areas of interest. Researchers distributed questionnaires for program evaluation to participants before arrival and upon departure, and 8 participated in semistructured interviews.RESULTS Five themes emerged from the qualitative data: expectations of POETIC, differences in oncology between the United States and sub-Saharan Africa, positive elements of the program, areas for improvement, and potential impact. Fellows identified several elements of Western health care that will inform their practice: patient-centered care, research development, and collaboration among medical, radiation, and surgical oncologists. The time in Boston modeled a research infrastructure that participants expressed interest in emulating at their home hospitals. In addition, the fellowship inspired some participants to address prevention and survivorship efforts in their home countries. From the quantitative data, feedback was primarily around logistical areas for improvement.CONCLUSION POETIC was found to be feasible and valuable. The results from the first years justify the program’s continuation in hopes of strengthening global health partnerships to support oncology training in Africa. One weakness is the small number of fellows, which will limit the impact of the study and the relevance of its conclusions. Future work will involve long-term follow up with participants and the development of an alumni network.