Open AccessPromoting Evidence-Based Practices for Breast Cancer Care Through Web-Based Collaborative Learning
Author(s) -
Mishka K. Cira,
Allison Dvaladze,
Robel Tesfay,
Jo Anne Zujewski,
Kalina Duncan
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
jco global oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2687-8941
DOI - 10.1200/go.20.49000
Subject(s) - breast cancer , medicine , mentorship , empowerment , health care , medical education , psychology , cancer , political science , law
PURPOSE The objective of the Project ECHO (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes) for Knowledge Summaries for Comprehensive Breast Cancer Control (KSBC) was to strengthen the capacity to plan and implement evidence-based, resource-appropriate breast cancer control programs using virtual case-based learning within a global network of experts and peers.METHODS The KSBC ECHO was a collaboration between the US National Cancer Institute Center for Global Health, Women’s Empowerment Cancer Advocacy Network, and Breast Health Global Initiative in alignment with the Breast Cancer Initiative 2.5 campaign to reduce disparities in breast cancer outcomes. Using the ECHO model, we developed a 6-month Web-based program to support the development of locally relevant, resource-appropriate cancer control programs through mentorship and use of KSBCs. The course was advertised via existing networks, conferences, and social media. Breast cancer control project teams from around the world applied and were accepted to participate in the KSBC ECHO. Fourteen biweekly ECHO sessions were held via Zoom and included case presentations, didactic presentations, and discussion. Projects spanned the care continuum and sessions addressed preplanning, assessing need/barriers, setting objectives/priorities, and implementing/evaluating. Baseline and end point surveys were used to evaluate the ECHO program. Participants identified a mentor, completed worksheets, and presented on the project status.RESULTS Fifteen project teams from 11 countries—64 participants: advocates, clinicians, policymakers, and researchers—were enrolled. Twenty-eight participants (57%) completed the baseline and end point surveys. Analysis of the data using a paired t-test indicates that the knowledge increase was statistically significant: The average knowledge gain was 0.76 ± 0.89 (95% CI, 0.44 to 1.08; P < .0001). Additional feedback on the Web-based collaborative learning model will be presented.CONCLUSION The ECHO model encouraged interaction between policymakers, clinicians, advocates, and technical experts while using evidence-based tools to develop locally relevant, resource-appropriate implementation strategies and policy recommendations.