z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Multiple Perspectives on Breast Cancer Control to Guide Stakeholder Selection of Implementation Strategies: The Time to A.C.T. Study in Mwanza, Tanzania
Author(s) -
Anne F. Rositch,
Christina A. Chao,
Anna Passaniti,
Kisa Mwakatobe,
Kala Visvanathan,
Nestory Masalu
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
jco global oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2687-8941
DOI - 10.1200/go.20.38000
Subject(s) - tanzania , breast cancer , medicine , context (archaeology) , family medicine , notice , stakeholder , health care , nursing , cancer , paleontology , environmental science , public relations , environmental planning , political science , law , economics , biology , economic growth
PURPOSE Tanzania recently developed national guidelines for early diagnosis of breast cancer to combat increasing incidence and mortality. The aim of this multiphase, adaptive implementation science study was therefore to assess the local context, couple implementation strategies with identified barriers, and test these strategies to improve breast cancer control, creating an adaptive A.C.T. framework with broad applicability to other low- and middle-income country settings.METHODS The assessment phase was made up of a broad medical chart review of women seeking care for breast concerns (n = 664); a knowledge, attitudes, and practices survey of community women (n = 1,129); and a knowledge, attitudes, and practices survey of health care providers (n = 114), followed by in-depth interviews (n = 15).RESULTS Women presented to the Zonal Hospital with swelling (45%) or a palpable lump (31%), with an average symptom duration of 6 months. Most diagnoses were based on clinical exam only (54%) and included 16% breast cancer. Of these, 43% had no treatment recorded, 50% had surgery at a median of 2.5 months, and 7% had chemotherapy only. Knowledge surveys indicated that 59% of women had heard of breast cancer, but only 14% felt they knew any signs or symptoms. Encouragingly, 56% were fairly to very confident that they would notice breast changes, and 74% said they would be somewhat to very likely to seek care, with 96% noting the severity of symptoms as a motivator. Providers indicated that barriers to care included low community knowledge and repeated misdiagnosis at the primary level. The majority of providers (95%) believe clinical breast examination is feasible to implement for symptomatic patients, yet only 65% feel they have sufficient training.CONCLUSION In all, 8 larger barriers were synthesized and linked to evidence-based interventions as potential solutions. All barriers and solutions were ranked by key stakeholders on the basis of feasibility, importance, and sustainability. These were incorporated into a 3-component intervention to improve breast cancer care at the Zonal Hospital and rollout is underway.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here