High-Throughput Nucleotide Resolution Predictions of Assay Limitations Increase the Reliability and Concordance of Clinical Tests
Author(s) -
Jonathan Bieler,
Christian Pozzorini,
Jessica Garcia,
Alex Tuck,
Morgane Macheret,
Adrian Willig,
S. Couraud,
Xiaobin Xing,
Philippe Menu,
Lars M. Steinmetz,
Léa Payen,
Zhenyu Xu
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
jco clinical cancer informatics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.188
H-Index - 12
ISSN - 2473-4276
DOI - 10.1200/cci.21.00057
Subject(s) - concordance , computational biology , workflow , context (archaeology) , reliability (semiconductor) , computer science , sample (material) , dna sequencing , biology , data mining , genetics , dna , chemistry , database , chromatography , paleontology , power (physics) , physics , quantum mechanics
PURPOSE The ability of next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays to interrogate thousands of genomic loci has revolutionized genetic testing. However, translation to the clinic is impeded by false-negative results that pose a risk to patients. In response, regulatory bodies are calling for reliability measures to be reported alongside NGS results. Existing methods to estimate reliability do not account for sample- and position-specific variability, which can be significant. Here, we report an approach that computes reliability metrics for every genomic position and sample interrogated by an NGS assay.METHODS Our approach predicts the limit of detection (LOD), the lowest reliably detectable variant fraction, by taking technical factors into account. We initially explored how LOD is affected by input material amount, library conversion rate, sequencing coverage, and sequencing error rate. This revealed that LOD depends heavily on genomic context and sample properties. Using these insights, we developed a computational approach to predict LOD on the basis of a biophysical model of the NGS workflow. We focused on targeted assays for cell-free DNA, but, in principle, this approach applies to any NGS assay.RESULTS We validated our approach by showing that it accurately predicts LOD and distinguishes reliable from unreliable results when screening 580 lung cancer samples for actionable mutations. Compared with a standard variant calling workflow, our approach avoided most false negatives and improved interassay concordance from 94% to 99%.CONCLUSION Our approach, which we name LAVA (LOD-aware variant analysis), reports the LOD for every position and sample interrogated by an NGS assay. This enables reliable results to be identified and improves the transparency and safety of genetic tests.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom