
Impact on Quality of Documentation and Workload of the Introduction of a National Information Standard for Tumor Board Reporting
Author(s) -
Kees C.W.J. Ebben,
Melle Sieswerda,
Ernest J. T. Luiten,
Joan B. Heijns,
Carmen C. van der Pol,
Maud Bessems,
Aafke H. Honkoop,
Mathijs P. Hendriks,
Janneke Verloop,
Xander Verbeek
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
jco clinical cancer informatics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.188
H-Index - 12
ISSN - 2473-4276
DOI - 10.1200/cci.19.00050
Subject(s) - documentation , workload , guideline , medicine , reuse , data quality , quality (philosophy) , medical physics , computer science , operations management , pathology , engineering , philosophy , epistemology , waste management , programming language , operating system , metric (unit)
Tumor boards, clinical practice guidelines, and cancer registries are intertwined cancer care quality instruments. Standardized structured reporting has been proposed as a solution to improve clinical documentation, while facilitating data reuse for secondary purposes. This study describes the implementation and evaluation of a national standard for tumor board reporting for breast cancer on the basis of the clinical practice guideline and the potential for reusing clinical data for the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR).