Premium
Exception from Informed Consent Enrollment in Emergency Medical Research: Attitudes and Awareness
Author(s) -
Triner Wayne,
Jacoby Liva,
Shelton Wayne,
Burk Mathew,
Imarenakhue Samual,
Watt James,
Larkin Gregory,
McGee Glenn
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
academic emergency medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.221
H-Index - 124
eISSN - 1553-2712
pISSN - 1069-6563
DOI - 10.1197/j.aem.2006.08.019
Subject(s) - medicine , informed consent , waiver , family medicine , population , emergency department , nursing , alternative medicine , environmental health , pathology , political science , law
Objectives To explore attitudes surrounding exception from informed consent enrollment into research studies. In addition, the authors sought to determine the level of awareness of such an ongoing study among potential subjects, as defined by their presence in an emergency department (ED). Methods A convenience sample of urban academic ED patients and visitors was surveyed during a visit regarding their attitudes and awareness of an emergency exception from informed consent, blood‐substitute trial ongoing in the community. Results There was a 13% refusal rate, and 32% of those approached had characteristics that met exclusion criteria. There were 497 surveys analyzed. There was a predominance of women, Caucasians, and persons with at least some college education. Only 39 (8%) of respondents reported awareness of the ongoing blood substitute trial, and only 19 (4%) were able to list a risk or benefit of participation. Education, income, and age were not associated with reported awareness. Male gender, younger age, awareness of the existing exception from informed consent study, and being married were associated with greater acceptability for such enrollment practices. Conclusions The overall awareness of an ongoing exception from informed consent trial after community consultation and notification was low. A population with potential for enrollment in such a study did not demonstrate a high degree of acceptance of such practices. There were differences among certain demographic groups in the degree of acceptance. These differences may guide institutional review boards and investigators in community‐consultation strategies for future waiver of or exception from informed consent studies.