z-logo
Premium
Determining the Accuracy of a Rapid Point‐of‐care Test for Determining Rh(D) Phenotype
Author(s) -
Herold Thomas J.S.,
Whittaker Donna S.,
Glynn Theodore
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
academic emergency medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.221
H-Index - 124
eISSN - 1553-2712
pISSN - 1069-6563
DOI - 10.1197/j.aem.2004.12.014
Subject(s) - medicine , confidence interval , gold standard (test) , point of care , phenotype , sensitivity (control systems) , positive predicative value , pathology , genetics , predictive value , gene , biology , electronic engineering , engineering
Objectives: To determine the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of a point‐of‐care method for identifying Rh(D) phenotype. Methods: Rh(D) was determined using preserved whole blood via standard laboratory methods. Comparison testing was conducted using the HealthTEST Rh(D) card (Akers Laboratories, Thorofare, NJ). Results of the card test were visually interpreted and recorded. To achieve sensitivity and specificity of 99% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 98% to 100%), 380 Rh‐positive and 380 Rh‐negative samples were required. During card testing, convenience sampling was used. Card results were compared with official results, and statistical analysis was conducted. Results: In identifying Rh(D)‐positive phenotype, the card had a sensitivity of 98.9% and a specificity of 99.7% (95% CI = 0.99 ± 0.01). For Rh(D)‐negative phenotype, the card had a sensitivity of 99.7% and a specificity of 98.9% (95% CI = 0.99 ± 0.01). Conclusions: In identifying type D (Rh positive or Rh negative), the card achieves sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy to warrant further study.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here