Premium
The Association between White Blood Cell Count and Acute Myocardial Infarction In‐hospital Mortality: Findings from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction
Author(s) -
Grzybowski Mary,
Welch Robert D.,
Parsons Lori,
Ndumele Chiadi E.,
Chen Edmond,
Zalenski Robert,
Barron Hal V.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
academic emergency medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.221
H-Index - 124
eISSN - 1553-2712
pISSN - 1069-6563
DOI - 10.1197/j.aem.2004.06.005
Subject(s) - medicine , quartile , myocardial infarction , confidence interval , white blood cell , odds ratio , confounding , population , cardiology , environmental health
Abstract Objectives: Although cross‐sectional and prospective studies have shown that the white blood cell (WBC) count is associated with long‐term mortality for patients with ischemic heart disease, the role of the WBC count as an independent predictor of short‐term mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has not been examined as extensively. The objective of this study was to determine whether the WBC count is associated with in‐hospital mortality for patients with ischemic heart disease after controlling for potential confounders. Methods: From July 31, 2000, to July 31, 2001, the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 4 enrolled 186,727 AMI patients. A total of 115,273 patients were included in the analysis. Results: WBC counts were subdivided into intervals of 1,000/mL, and in‐hospital mortality rates were determined for each interval. The distribution revealed a J‐shaped curve. Patients with WBC counts >5,000/mL were subdivided into quartiles, whereas patients with WBC counts <5,000/mL were assigned to a separate category labeled “subquartile” and were analyzed separately. A linear increase in in‐hospital mortality by WBC count quartile was found. The unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for the fourth versus the first quartile showed strong associations with in‐hospital mortality among the entire population and by gender: 4.09 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 3.83 to 4.73) for all patients, 4.31 (95% CI = 3.93 to 4.73) for men, and 3.65 (95% CI = 3.32 to 4.01) for women. Following adjustment for covariates, the magnitude of the ORs attenuated, but the ORs remained highly significant (OR, 2.71 [95% CI = 2.53 to 2.90] for all patients; OR, 2.87 [95% CI = 2.59 to 3.19] for men; OR, 2.61 [95% CI = 2.36 to 2.99] for women). Reperfused patients had consistently lower in‐hospital mortality rates for all patients and by gender (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: The WBC count is an independent predictor of in‐hospital AMI mortality and may be useful in assessing the prognosis of AMI in conjunction with other early risk‐stratification factors. Whether elevated WBC count is a marker of the inflammatory process or is a direct risk factor for AMI remains unclear. Given the simplicity and availability of the WBC count, the authors conclude that the WBC count should be used in conjunction with other ancillary tests to assess the prognosis of a patient with AMI.