Deficient inflammatory response to UV radiation in neonatal mice

Mechanisms of juvenile susceptibility to cancer are not well understood. The immune response in neonates favors nonresponsiveness or T H 2‐dominant responses, raising the question of a role for neonatal immunity in this susceptibility. We have investigated the postulate that the inflammatory response differs in neonatal and adult skin. We found no inflammatory infiltrate into neonatal mouse skin in response to UV irradiation as a function of time, dose, or wavelength, although UV‐induced DNA damage was readily detected. In contrast, UV irradiation of adult mice initiated a dose‐ and time‐dependent influx of inflammatory cells, chiefly CD11b + Ly6G + neutrophils, into the skin, detected by immunohistochemistry and quantitated by FACS analysis. This inflammatory response was initiated by UVB (290–320 nm) but not by UVA (320–400 nm). Further, in neonates, in contrast to adults, neither topical trinitrochlorobenzene (TNCB) nor i.p. thioglycollate initiated an inflammatory infiltrate. Conversely, topical TNCB applied to neonates was tolerogenic, resulting in a subsequent antigen‐specific decrease of the contact‐hypersensitivity response in adults. Neonatal blood contained abundant neutrophils, which exhibited impaired chemotaxis to the chemokine growth‐related oncogene‐α but efficient chemotaxis to the bacterial product fMLP, concomitant with decreased expression of CXCR2 but normal levels of CD11b. We propose this neonatal deficiency in the inflammatory response is a significant, previously unrecognized factor in neonatal immune tolerance and may contribute to neonatal susceptibility to cancer, including melanoma and other UV‐induced cancers.