Premium
Caveat experimentor: reporting expression profiling data involving multiple, functionally redundant isoforms
Author(s) -
Robey R. Brooks
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
journal of leukocyte biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.819
H-Index - 191
eISSN - 1938-3673
pISSN - 0741-5400
DOI - 10.1189/jlb.0403165
Subject(s) - biology , computational biology , gene expression profiling , expression (computer science) , profiling (computer programming) , dilemma , gene expression , publication , gene , bioinformatics , genetics , computer science , epistemology , programming language , operating system , philosophy , advertising , business
Transcriptional profiling provides a powerful means for examining global gene expression patterns for possible teleologic relationships without making a priori assumptions [1]. Unfortunately, decisions regarding which data subsets to report are not always exempt from such considerations. Thus, the selective reporting of transcriptosome information can pose a significant dilemma for author and reader alike. The tendency is to publish only those data reflecting the greatest changes. This practice presumes that the largest differences will be the most significant functionally, and in most instances, this is probably a reasonable assumption. However, thresholds for reporting differences vary widely across datasets, primarily on the basis of statistical considerations that are sometimes arbitrary from a physiologic or metabolic perspective. Changes associated with processes involving multiple, functionally redundant species are particularly problematic and may not be individually robust enough for identification. In such cases, incomplete data reporting may inadvertently result in errors of omission that introduce artificial biases or promote misleading functional inferences. The recent report by Kobayashi et al. [2] illustrates some of these potential pitfalls. These authors describe postphagocytic changes in leukocyte transcript abundance for a number of important metabolic genes that are temporally associated with changes in transcript abundance for genes associated with apoptotic susceptibility. The suggestion that this represents a coordinated gene expression program linking metabolism to apoptosis is both intriguing and plausible. However, the accompanying mechanistic inferences are not fully supported by the data, so a few alternative interpretations are considered below. The reported increases in post-phagocytic glucose (Glc) disappearance and lactate accumulation are consistent with increased glycolytic metabolism, although the suggestion that decreased Glc phosphorylating capacity, vis-a-vis hexokinase (HK) activity, contributes to these changes is biochemically implausible. By catalyzing the first committed step of Glc metabolism, the phosphorylation of Glc to yield Glc-6-P, HKs are responsible for the initiation of all physiologically relevant pathways of exogenous Glc utilization. Thus, HKs act proximal to all metabolic pathways invoked to explain the authors’ findings. For example, phosphorylation by HKs is a prerequisite for Glc flux through the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP). The oxidative reactions of this pathway constitute the chief cellular source of reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate for the bioreduction of glutathione, thioredoxin, and biliverdin. Thus, the reported increase in reduced glutathione content provides strong biochemical evidence of increased PPP flux. However, it is unlikely that primary decreases in cellular Glc phosphorylating capacity would lead to increased PPP flux. Inferences regarding functional coupling between glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation are similarly problematic, insofar as the coupling reactions are ostensibly dependent on glycolytic flux for substrate provision. These inferences rely largely on transcriptosome information alone. This effectively equates transcript abundance to cognate enzyme function and ignores both the concept of distributive metabolic control and a number of important controlling influences within the cell, including substrate availability, feedback inhibition, and intracellular compartmentalization [3]. Thus, changes in downstream components of individual metabolic flux pathways are insufficient to explain the apparent discrepancy between HK transcript abundance and Glc use. A simpler and more plausible explanation could involve directionally opposite changes in unreported HK isoforms with greater relative contributions to the total, and there is a rational basis for such speculation. Although widely expressed, HKIII does not constitute the principal isoform in any tissue examined [4], including leukocytes, which express several high-affinity HK isoforms [5, 6]. Activities corresponding to HKI and HKIII are well described in these cells, and HKII has been reported in low abundance [6]. However, HKI clearly predominates. Assuming that the microarray is representative of the total expressed leukocyte gene pool, it would be useful to know the magnitude and direction of corresponding changes in HKI and HKII abundance. The proposed link between glycolysis and apoptosis also warrants scrutiny. The authors suggest that decreased expression of HK and antiapoptotic regulators of HK activity (e.g., phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and Akt) contribute to the increased apoptosis observed in their model. It is important to note, however, that the antiapoptotic effects of these factors are Glc-dependent [7–9]. The corresponding relationship between Glc and cell death is thus fundamentally different and directionally opposite that described by Kobayashi et al. [2]. The reported proapoptotic effects of Glc in the latter case could suggest specific contributions by increased reactive oxygen species generation [10] or uncoupled cytosolic adenosine 5 triphosphate (ATP) hydrolysis [11], changes that would be predicted to functionally oppose some of the suggested meta-