z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Oral ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma
Author(s) -
Thierry Façon,
Christopher P. Venner,
Nizar J. Bahlis,
Fritz Offner,
Darrell White,
Lionel Karlin,
Lotfi Benboubker,
Sophie Rigaudeau,
Philippe Rodon,
Éric Voog,
SungSoo Yoon,
Kenshi Suzuki,
Hirohiko Shibayama,
Xiaoquan Zhang,
Philip TwumasiAnkrah,
Godwin Yung,
Robert M. Rifkin,
Philippe Moreau,
Sagar Lonial,
Shaji Kumar,
Paul G. Richardson,
S. Vincent Rajkumar
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
blood
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.515
H-Index - 465
eISSN - 1528-0020
pISSN - 0006-4971
DOI - 10.1182/blood.2020008787
Subject(s) - ixazomib , medicine , lenalidomide , hazard ratio , placebo , multiple myeloma , adverse effect , clinical endpoint , surgery , randomized controlled trial , confidence interval , carfilzomib , alternative medicine , pathology
Continuous lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd)-based regimens are among the standards of care in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. The oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib is suitable for continuous dosing, with predictable, manageable toxicities. In the double-blind, placebo-controlled TOURMALINE-MM2 trial, transplant-ineligible NDMM patients were randomized to ixazomib 4 mg (n = 351) or placebo (n = 354) plus Rd. After 18 cycles, dexamethasone was discontinued and treatment was continued using reduced-dose ixazomib (3 mg) and lenalidomide (10 mg) until progression/toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Median PFS was 35.3 vs 21.8 months with ixazomib-Rd vs placebo-Rd, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.830; 95% confidence interval, 0.676-1.018; P = .073; median follow-up, 53.3 and 55.8 months). Complete (26% vs 14%; odds ratio [OR], 2.10; P < .001) and ≥ very good partial response (63% vs 48%; OR, 1.87; P < .001) rates were higher with ixazomib-Rd vs placebo-Rd. In a prespecified high-risk cytogenetics subgroup, median PFS was 23.8 vs 18.0 months (HR, 0.690; P = .019). Overall, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mostly grade 1/2. With ixazomib-Rd vs placebo-Rd, 88% vs 81% of patients experienced grade ≥3 TEAEs, 66% vs 62% serious TEAEs, and 35% vs 27% TEAEs resulting in regimen discontinuation; 8% vs 6% died on study. Addition of ixazomib to Rd was tolerable with no new safety signals and led to a clinically meaningful PFS benefit of 13.5 months. Ixazomib-Rd is a feasible option for certain patients who can benefit from an all-oral triplet combination. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01850524.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom