Role of urine immunofixation in the complete response assessment of MM patients other than light-chain-only disease
Author(s) -
Juan José Lahuerta,
Ana Jiménez Ubieto,
Bruno Paiva,
Joaquín MartínezLópez,
José González-Medina,
Lucía LópezAnglada,
MaríaTeresa Cedena,
Noemí Puig,
Albert Oriol,
MaríaJesús Blanchard,
Rafael Ríos,
Jesús Martín,
Rafael Martínez,
Anna Sureda,
MiguelTeodoro Hernández,
Javier de la Rubia,
Isabel Krsnik,
Valentín Cabañas,
Luis Palomera,
Joan Bargay,
MaríaVictoria Mateos,
Laura Rosiñol,
Jesús F. San Miguel,
Joan Bladé
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
blood
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.515
H-Index - 465
eISSN - 1528-0020
pISSN - 0006-4971
DOI - 10.1182/blood.2019000671
Subject(s) - immunofixation , medicine , multiple myeloma , serum protein electrophoresis , gastroenterology , urine , myeloma protein , minimal residual disease , monoclonal , surgery , immunology , antibody , monoclonal antibody , bone marrow
Response criteria for multiple myeloma (MM) require monoclonal protein (M-protein)–negative status on both serum immunofixation electrophoresis (sIFE) and urine (uIFE) immunofixation electrophoresis for classification of complete response (CR). However, uIFE is not always performed for sIFE-negative patients. We analyzed M-protein evaluations from 384 MM patients (excluding those with light-chain-only disease) treated in the GEM2012MENOS65 (NCT01916252) trial to determine the uIFE-positive rate in patients who became sIFE-negative posttreatment and evaluate rates of minimal residual disease (MRD)–negative status and progression-free survival (PFS) among patients achieving CR, CR but without uIFE available (uncertain CR; uCR), or very good partial response (VGPR). Among 107 patients with M-protein exclusively in serum at diagnosis who became sIFE-negative posttreatment and who had uIFE available, the uIFE-positive rate was 0%. Among 161 patients with M-protein in both serum and urine at diagnosis who became sIFE-negative posttreatment, 3 (1.8%) were uIFE positive. Among patients achieving CR vs uCR, there were no significant differences in postconsolidation MRD-negative (<10−6; 76% vs 75%; P = .9) and 2-year PFS (85% vs 88%; P = .4) rates; rates were significantly lower among patients achieving VGPR. Our results suggest that uIFE is not necessary for defining CR in MM patients other than those with light-chain-only disease.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom