z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Commemorative Place Names — Their Specificity and Problems
Author(s) -
D. Jérôme
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
names
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1756-2279
pISSN - 0027-7738
DOI - 10.1179/002777311x13082331190074
Subject(s) - toponymy , bulgarian , ideology , linguistics , politics , slovak , history , czech , value (mathematics) , equivalence (formal languages) , genealogy , proper noun , law , political science , computer science , philosophy , machine learning
This paper focuses on the distinctive features of a particular type of geographical name, referred to as commemorative place names: e.g. Bat´ov, Gottwaldov, Frunze, Leningrad, or Stalingrad. These features are illustrated with primarily Czech toponymic material, presented in comparison to Slovak, Russian, Yugoslav, and Bulgarian place names. Commemorative names display several specific and distinctive features as a consequence of their dependence on political regimes and ideologies. These features include the domination of naming above other onymic functions and the elevation of naming to a symbolic act; instability, manifested in frequent changes and renamings; high ideological value, reflected in the importance of equivalence between the place and its name; and certain difficulties involved in using such place names in everyday communication. These distinctive features could be considered compelling reasons for the establishment of a specific type of geographical name, termed “commemorative place names.”

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here