Open AccessComparison of Inlay Cartilage Butterfly and Underlay Temporal Fascia Tympanoplasty
Author(s) -
Lubianca Neto José Faibes,
Koerig Schuster Artur,
Neves Lubianca João Pedro,
Eavey Roland Douglas
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
oto open
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2473-974X
DOI - 10.1177/2473974x221108935
Subject(s) - tympanoplasty , underlay , butterfly , inlay , fascia , cartilage , anatomy , medicine , computer science , biology , surgery , telecommunications , dentistry , signal to noise ratio (imaging) , ecology
Objective To systematically review the results of inlay cartilage butterfly tympanoplasty and standard underlay temporal fascia tympanoplasty for anatomic and functional end points. Data Sources PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Virtual Health Library (VHL/Lilacs) databases were searched from inception through April 2, 2021. No restrictions on language, publication year, or publication status were applied. Review Methods The meta‐analysis included data from articles that met inclusion criteria and were extracted by 2 authors independently. The PRISMA statement was followed. Risk of Bias 2.0 and Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale were used to assess risk of bias. The primary outcome was tympanic membrane closure rate. The secondary outcome was improvement of the air‐bone gap. Results Ten studies were included, 9 cohort studies and 1 randomized clinical trial, with 577 patients. The graft take rate was 82.8% in the butterfly cartilage inlay tympanoplasty group and 85.2% in the temporal fascia underlay tympanoplasty group (relative risk, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.93‐1.11; I 2 = 42%, P =. 08). The air‐bone gap reduction ranged from 6.1 to 11.28 in the butterfly cartilage inlay group and from 5.2 to 12.66 in the temporal fascia underlay group, with a mean difference between groups of −2.08 (95% CI, −3.23 to −0.94; I 2 = 58%, P =. 04), favoring temporal fascia underlay. Conclusion The 2 tympanoplasty techniques analyzed here produced similar results in terms of successful reconstruction of the tympanic membrane and reduction in the air‐bone gap. Neither age nor follow‐up length of time influenced outcomes.