z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Does the Peer Group Matter? Assessing Frog Pond Effects in Transition to Secondary Schooling
Author(s) -
Peter Rohde Skov
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
socius
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2378-0231
DOI - 10.1177/23780231221088652
Subject(s) - peer effects , peer group , danish , psychology , educational attainment , secondary education , academic achievement , selection (genetic algorithm) , developmental psychology , mathematics education , social psychology , political science , computer science , linguistics , philosophy , artificial intelligence , law
Peers are considered important for adolescents’ educational achievement and attainment, though little conclusive evidence demonstrate peer comparison effects. Using school and year fixed-effects models to account for peer group selection and comprehensive Danish administrative data on more than 260,000 students, across six cohorts, this study provides evidence of the so-called frog pond effect on the choice of secondary education among adolescents in Denmark. The frog pond effect is based upon a social comparison mechanism with heterogeneous effects. Through peer achievement, the author investigates the heterogeneous effects and show that peer achievement has different effects for low- and high-achieving students on choice of secondary education. The results shows that low-achieving students benefit from having high-achieving peers, while high-achieving students are negatively affected by their high-achieving peers, although only to a small extent. These findings lend support to the frog pond effect for high-achieving students.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here