z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Feasibility and Limitations of Proning Protocol for Nonintubated Patients With COVID-19
Author(s) -
Benjamin Shoults,
Mary Barber,
Lucia Millham,
Maaz Mulla,
Natasha Nanji,
Grant Steele,
Tyler Peck,
Patrick Smithedajkul,
Christopher M. Worsham,
Paul F. Currier,
Rebecca A. Raphaely
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of patient experience
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2374-3743
pISSN - 2374-3735
DOI - 10.1177/2374373520981486
Subject(s) - medicine , intubation , covid-19 , intensive care medicine , emergency medicine , anesthesia , disease , infectious disease (medical specialty)
Proning awake patients with COVID-19 is associated with lower mortality and intubation rates. However, these studies also demonstrate low participation rates and tolerance of awake proning. In this study, we attempt to understand barriers to proning. Medical and dental students surveyed nonintubated patients to understand factors affecting adherence to a proning protocol. Only patients who discussed proning with their medical team attempted the practice. Eight of nine patients who were informed about benefits of proning attempted the maneuver. Discomfort was the primary reason patients stopped proning. Addressing discomfort and implementing systematic patient education may increase adherence to proning.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom