z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Self-criticisms toward a socially responsible science in the field of management
Author(s) -
Jesús de FrutosBelizón,
Fernando Martín Alcázar,
Gonzalo SánchezGardey
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
business research quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.995
H-Index - 26
eISSN - 2340-9444
pISSN - 2340-9436
DOI - 10.1177/23409444211062230
Subject(s) - scholarship , field (mathematics) , engineering ethics , relevance (law) , sociology , action (physics) , critical management studies , political science , public relations , knowledge management , social science , computer science , engineering , law , physics , mathematics , quantum mechanics , pure mathematics
Management scholarship should be placed in a unique position to develop relevant scientific knowledge because business and management organizations are deeply involved in most global challenges. However, different critical voices have recently been raised in essays and editorials, and reports have questioned research in the management field, identifying multiple deficiencies that can limit the growth of a relatively young field. Based on an analysis of published criticisms of management research, we would like to shed light on the current state of management research and identify some limitations that should be considered and should guide the growth of this field of knowledge. This work offers guidance on the main problems of the discipline that should be addressed to encourage the transformation of management research to meet both scientific rigor and social relevance. The article ends with a discussion and a call to action for directing research toward the possibility and necessity of reinforcing “responsible research” in the management field. JEL CLASSIFICATION: M00, M10

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here