Open AccessHow an Antiscience President and the COVID-19 Pandemic Altered the Career Trajectories of STEM PhD Students of Color
Author(s) -
Ebony O. McGee,
Yuan Fang,
Yibin Ni,
Thema Monroe-White
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
aera open
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2332-8584
DOI - 10.1177/23328584211039217
Subject(s) - timeline , graduation (instrument) , pandemic , covid-19 , psychology , career development , higher education , public relations , medical education , political science , sociology , pedagogy , medicine , geography , geometry , mathematics , disease , archaeology , pathology , infectious disease (medical specialty) , law
In this mixed-methods study, we performed content analysis on openended survey items to reveal primary themes related to how PhD students are responding to the Trump policies and the COVID-19 pandemic. In our data set, 40.7% of the respondents reported that their career plans have been affected by Trump’s antiscience policies, 54.5% by the COVID-19 pandemic. Our study revealed three themes, which were (1) awareness of the reduced funding for STEM (science, engineering, technology, and mathematics) and higher education, (2) heightened awareness of and commitment to the pursuit of social and racial justice, (3) interest in seeking job opportunities abroad. The top three themes for the COVID-19 pandemic were (1) shifting graduation timelines and adjusting research to the virtual campus life; (2) losing jobs, concerning about hiring freezes and fewer job openings; and (3) reconsidering their place in a STEM field postpandemic, including a possible complete change in career plans; thoughts of leaving the country for international jobs.