
Self-Report Measures in the Assessment of Antiretroviral Medication Adherence
Author(s) -
Lassané Kaboré,
Paul Muntner,
Eric Chamot,
Anne Zinski,
Greer Burkholder,
Michael J. Mugavero
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of the international association of providers of aids care
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.813
H-Index - 31
eISSN - 2325-9582
pISSN - 2325-9574
DOI - 10.1177/2325957414557263
Subject(s) - medicine , confidence interval , viral load , visual analogue scale , antiretroviral therapy , medication adherence , gold standard (test) , pharmacy , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , antiretroviral medication , likert scale , physical therapy , family medicine , statistics , mathematics
Background: Adherence is a major determinant of the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy (ART). We determined the association between self-reported adherence (SRA) and medication possession ratio (MPR), a pharmacy-based adherence measure, and their respective associations with viral load. Methods: Adherence to ART was assessed by MPR over 6 months and by self-report which included a question with a Likert-type scale response, a visual analogue scale (VAS), and an inquiry about the last time the patients skipped any prescribed medications. Results: Taking MPR as the “gold standard,” all 3 SRA measures displayed high specificity but low sensitivity. The prevalence ratio (95% confidence interval) for viral load ≥50 copies/mL was 2.19 (1.07-4.50) for MPR <90%, 1.98 (1.04-3.78) for poor/fair/good versus excellent/very good ability to take antiretroviral drugs, 1.47 (0.79-2.75) for skipping medications within the past 2 weeks, and 2.51 (1.39-4.53) for VAS <95%. Conclusion: These data suggest various SRA measures hold clinical value in screening for poor ART adherence.