Medical Risks and Benefits of Newborn Male Circumcision in the United States
Author(s) -
Lea Matar,
Julia Zhu,
Robert T. Chen,
Deborah A. Gust
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of the international association of providers of aids care (jiapac)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.813
H-Index - 31
eISSN - 2325-9582
pISSN - 2325-9574
DOI - 10.1177/2325957414535975
Subject(s) - medicine , family medicine , male circumcision , environmental health , population , health services
In 2012, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) published recommendations that physicians should discuss with parents the benefits and risks of newborn male circumcision. Our objective was to assess physicians’ perspectives of newborn male circumcision. Methods: A self-administered, cross-sectional electronic survey of US physicians was conducted in 2008 (N = 1500). Results: Approximately one-third (33.2%) of the respondents reported that their current perspective was that the medical benefits outweigh the risks associated with newborn male circumcision and less than one-third (31.1%) reported they would recommend the procedure when counseling parents. Conclusions: In 2008, only about one-third of the physicians surveyed thought that the benefits of male circumcision outweighed the risks and recommended it to parents of newborn sons. These attitudes may be relevant to the declining circumcision rates in the United States. Repeat surveys may be useful, given the new AAP and ACOG recommendations.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom